1031 Exchange Service
Why CPA and tax advisor coordination should start before purchase terms are set in a Hamptons 1031 exchange, not after they are signed.
Start an Exchange ReviewThe CPA conversation usually happens after the purchase and sale terms are already set, which is one deadline too late. Basis, depreciation recapture, and boot exposure are easier to manage when the tax advisor sees the numbers before they are locked in, not after. By the time the CPA is finally looped in, the room to adjust anything has often already closed.
Once a purchase price and closing date are agreed to, the room to adjust structure for tax reasons narrows considerably. A CPA who is looped in during the identification stage can flag basis issues, entity ownership questions, or boot exposure while there is still time to change the plan, rather than after the numbers are fixed.
A short call before an offer is signed can save weeks of unwinding a structure later, and it costs far less than the alternative. Even a preliminary estimate from the CPA, caveated as rough, is more useful at this stage than a precise number produced too late to act on.
A useful advisor coordination file includes:
Sending these items in one packet, rather than in scattered emails over several weeks, is what lets a CPA give a useful answer quickly. A CPA working without one of these pieces is essentially guessing at part of the calculation, which is a poor position to be in this close to a filing deadline.
Boot can come from cash received, debt relief that is not replaced, or non-like-kind property included in the deal, and calculating it accurately requires the depreciation schedule and debt figures from both properties side by side. A CPA working from incomplete numbers can only give a rough estimate, which is not the same as a reviewed calculation the investor can rely on at tax filing time. Depreciation recapture in particular deserves its own conversation, since it is taxed differently from ordinary capital gain and can represent a meaningful share of the total tax exposure on a long-held property.
East End ownership frequently runs through trusts, family LLCs, or multi-generational holding structures, sometimes with advisors in more than one state. Coordinating those advisors on a shared set of facts, rather than letting each one work from a different summary of the deal, is what keeps the exchange from producing conflicting guidance at the worst possible time.
A single conflicting instruction between two advisors, discovered close to closing, can force a delay that a shared document would have prevented entirely. A family LLC with several beneficiaries may also need internal agreement on the exchange strategy itself, which is a conversation worth having well before any advisor coordination begins.
A simple shared log of what has been sent to the CPA, what questions are outstanding, and what deadline each one is tied to keeps the advisor relationship from becoming a bottleneck. The alternative, informal updates by phone, tends to produce the kind of gap that only surfaces after the return is filed. This log does not need to be complicated, but it does need to be maintained consistently, since a coordination system nobody actually updates is no better than having none at all.
No. The QI has restrictions on who can serve in that role, including disqualifying relationships with the taxpayer's existing advisors in certain cases. The CPA and QI should be coordinated but remain separate parties with separate roles.
Boot is any non-like-kind value received in the exchange, such as cash or unreplaced debt relief, and it is generally taxable. Calculating it early, rather than after closing, gives the investor a chance to adjust debt or cash contribution to reduce or eliminate it. Investors sometimes assume boot is unavoidable in any exchange, when in fact careful debt and cash planning can often reduce or eliminate it entirely.
Ideally yes, since the properties named on the identification letter affect the boot calculation and depreciation planning. Involving the CPA after the letter is sent removes the chance to adjust the plan based on their review.
Different advisors may have different assumptions about entity structure or filing requirements unless they are working from the same shared document, which is why a single coordination log matters more when more than one advisor is involved.
The relinquished property's original purchase price and depreciation schedule, current debt balances, ownership entity details, and a rough closing timeline. Sending these together gives the CPA enough context to flag major issues on the first pass.
It is the portion of gain attributable to depreciation previously claimed on the property, taxed at its own rate rather than as ordinary capital gain, and it is a calculation the CPA should walk through specifically rather than folding into a general gain estimate.